AP Language · speech · 14 min

Pericles' Funeral Oration

At a public funeral for Athens’ first war dead, Pericles spends most of his speech praising the city itself, arguing that a democracy this free and bold was worth dying for.

⏱ 14 min to understand the speech 6 steps of reasoning · 6 rhetorical choices Public domain text
📖 Read the full text on this pageEvery paragraph numbered, so you can cite it
0% explored
The whole speech in 60 seconds

In the winter that closed the first year of the war between Athens and Sparta, Athens buried its fallen soldiers at public cost, and the statesman Pericles was chosen to speak. We know the speech only through the historian Thucydides, who reports it in Book 2 of his History of the Peloponnesian War, so the words are his rendering of what Pericles said. It is one of the earliest descriptions of democracy from someone who lived in one. Watch how little of it is about the dead men and how much is about the city, and notice what the praise leaves out.

The claim

Athens is a free, open and capable democracy, a model for all of Greece, and its greatness is what gives meaning to the deaths of its soldiers. The living should love the city as the dead did and be ready to face danger for it.

The rhetorical situation who, to whom, when, and why

SpeakerPericles, son of Xanthippus, the leading statesman of Athens, chosen by the city to give the oration. The words come to us through Thucydides, an Athenian who lived through the war and wrote its history, and here through Richard Crawley’s English translation.
AudienceThe crowd at the public funeral, ‘whether citizens or foreigners’, as paragraph 2 puts it, including the parents, sons, brothers and widows of the dead, addressed in paragraphs 10 and 11. Thucydides’ readers form a second audience.
OccasionThe public funeral held in winter for the Athenians who had fallen in the first year of the Peloponnesian War. By custom, a man chosen by the state spoke after the bones of the dead were buried in the public sepulchre.
ExigenceAthens had lost its first soldiers in a war with Sparta that was only beginning, and the law required a speech in their honor (paragraphs 1 and 12).
PurposeTo honor the dead by praising the city they died for, to strengthen the resolve of the living for the war ahead, and to offer comfort to the families.
ContextThe Peloponnesian War between Athens and its allies and Sparta and its allies began in 431 BC and ended with Athens’ defeat in 404 BC. In his History, Thucydides admits that he could not recall speeches word for word and gives what he thought the occasion called for, keeping to the general sense. A plague struck Athens soon after this speech, and Pericles died in 429 BC.
Place

The public sepulchre, Athens

Thucydides says the dead were buried in the public sepulchre in ‘the Beautiful suburb’ of the city, and that Pericles spoke from an elevated platform so the crowd could hear.

Time

Winter, at the end of the first year of the war

The funeral closed the first year of the Peloponnesian War, which began in 431 BC. Much harder years lay ahead.

What Pericles' Funeral Oration says

Pericles begins by doubting the custom of the funeral speech. Deeds, he says, are best honored by deeds, and a single speaker risks the reputation of many brave men: friends will find the praise too small, and strangers, out of envy, will suspect exaggeration. Still, the law requires a speech, so he will obey. He praises the ancestors who kept the land free, the fathers who won the empire, and the present generation who enlarged it. Before praising the dead, he will describe the government and habits that made Athens great. Athens’ constitution, he says, is a model for others. It is called a democracy because it favors the many, gives equal justice in private disputes, and rewards ability rather than class or wealth. Citizens are tolerant of one another in private life but obey the magistrates and the laws, written and unwritten. The city offers games, festivals and goods from all over the world. It is open to foreigners, and Athenians, without the harsh training of their rivals, are just as brave. They use wealth for use rather than show, see debate as a preparation for action, and combine daring with careful thought. Athens, he says, is the school of Hellas, and it needs no Homer to praise it, because its monuments cover every land and sea. The dead fought for this city. Their brave end covered any faults, and they chose to die resisting rather than live submitting. The survivors must love Athens as they did, remembering that heroes have the whole earth for their tomb. To the parents Pericles offers comfort rather than pity and urges those still young to have more children. Sons and brothers will struggle to match the dead, and widows will win the greatest glory by being least talked about. The state will raise the children of the dead at public expense. Having done what the law requires, he dismisses the mourners.

The line of reasoning how the argument moves

  1. Doubts the power of wordsParagraph 1 questions whether any speech can do justice to deeds and warns of envy and disbelief. The modest opening wins goodwill and sets up the contrast between words and deeds that runs through the speech.
  2. Turns from ancestors to the cityParagraph 2 briefly honors the ancestors and fathers, then announces a plan: to describe the government and habits that made Athens great before praising the dead. This turn explains why so much of the speech is about the city.
  3. Praises Athenian democracyParagraphs 3 to 5 describe equal justice, promotion by merit, tolerance in private life, obedience to law, leisure, openness and natural courage, each implicitly set against Sparta. The portrait gives the audience a city worth fighting for.
  4. Names Athens the school of HellasParagraphs 6 and 7 praise the Athenian character and claim the city is a model for all of Greece. The praise peaks here, just before the speaker links it to the dead.
  5. Links the dead to the cityParagraphs 8 and 9 say that praising Athens has already praised the men who made it great, describe their choice to die rather than submit, and ask the living to love the city as much. The argument’s purpose, resolve for the war, becomes explicit.
  6. Consoles and dismissesParagraphs 10 to 12 speak to parents, sons, brothers and widows in turn, promise state support for the children, and send the mourners home. The speech ends as it began, with the law’s requirements.

The full text paragraphs numbered for citation

¶1‘Most of my predecessors in this place have commended him who made this speech part of the law, from the feeling that it is well that it should be delivered at the burial of those who fall in battle. For myself, I should have thought that the worth which had displayed itself in deeds, would be sufficiently rewarded by honours also shown by deeds; such as you now see in this funeral prepared at the people’s cost. And I could have wished that the reputation of many brave men were not to be imperilled in the mouth of a single individual, to stand or fall according as he spoke ill or well. For it is hard to speak properly upon a subject where it is even difficult to convince your hearers that you are speaking the truth. On the one hand, the friend who is familiar with every fact of the story, may think that some point has not been set forth with that fulness which he wishes and knows it to deserve; on the other, he who is a stranger to the matter may be led by envy to suspect exaggeration if he hears anything above his own nature. For men can endure to hear others praised only so long as they can severally persuade themselves of their own ability to equal the actions recounted: when this point is passed, envy comes in and with it incredulity. However, since our ancestors have stamped this custom with their approval, it becomes my duty to obey the law and to try to satisfy your several wishes and opinions as best I may.

¶2‘I shall begin with our ancestors: it is both just and proper that they should have the honour of the first mention on an occasion like the present. They dwelt in the country without break in the succession from generation to generation, and handed it down free to the present time by their valour. And if they deserve praise, much more do our immediate fathers, who added to their inheritance the empire which we now possess, and spared no pains to be able to leave their acquisitions to us of the present generation. Lastly, there are few parts of our dominions that have not been augmented by those of us here, who are still for the most part in the vigour of life; while the mother country has been furnished by us with everything that can enable her to depend on her own resources whether for war or for peace. That part of our history which tells of the military achievements which gave us our several possessions, or of the ready valour with which either we or our fathers stemmed the tide of Hellenic or foreign aggression, is a theme too familiar to my hearers for me to dilate on, and I shall therefore pass it by. But what was the road by which we reached our position, what the form of government under which our greatness grew, what the national habits out of which it sprang; these are questions which I may try to solve before I proceed to my panegyric upon these men; since I think this to be a subject upon which on the present occasion a speaker may properly dwell, and to which the whole assemblage, whether citizens or foreigners, may listen with advantage.

¶3‘Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighbouring states; but we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves. Its administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy. If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences; if to social standing, advancement in public life falls to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to interfere with merit; while as to poverty, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his condition. The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to our ordinary life. There, far from exercising a jealous surveillance over each other, we do not feel called upon to be angry with our neighbour for doing what he likes, or even to indulge in those injurious looks which cannot fail to be offensive, although they inflict no positive penalty. But all this ease in our private relations does not make us lawless as citizens. Against this fear is our chief safeguard, teaching us to obey the magistrates and the laws, particularly such as regard the protection of the injured, whether they are actually on the statute book, or belong to that code which, although unwritten, yet cannot be broken without acknowledged disgrace.

¶4‘Further, we provide plenty of means for the mind to refresh itself from business. At stated periods of the year we celebrate games and sacrifices; besides which the elegance of our private establishments forms a daily source of pleasure and helps to banish the spleen. While the magnitude of our city draws the produce of the world into our harbour, so that to the Athenian the fruits of other countries are as familiar a luxury as those of his own.

¶5‘If we turn to our military policy, there also we differ from our antagonists. We throw open our city to the world, and never by alien acts exclude foreigners from any opportunity of learning or observing, although the eyes of an enemy may occasionally profit by our liberality; trusting less in system and policy than to the native spirit of our citizens; while in education, where our rivals from their very cradles by a painful discipline seek after manliness, at Athens we live exactly as we please, and yet are just as ready to encounter every legitimate danger. In proof of this it may be noticed that the Lacedæmonians never invade our country with a contingent, but with the whole of their confederates; while we Athenians advance unsupported into the territory of a neighbour, and fighting upon a foreign soil usually vanquish with ease men who are defending their homes. While our united force was never yet encountered by any enemy, through our being at once occupied with our marine and being by land continually despatched upon a hundred different services; so that, wherever they engage with some such fraction of our strength, a success against a detachment is magnified into a victory over the nation, and a defeat into a reverse suffered at the hands of our entire people. And yet if with habits not of labour but of ease, and courage not of art but of nature, we are still willing to encounter danger, we have the double advantage of escaping the experience of hardships in anticipation and of facing them in the hour of need as fearlessly as those who are never free from them.

¶6‘Nor are these the only points in which our city is worthy of admiration. Cultivating refinement without extravagance and knowledge without effeminacy, we employ our wealth more for use than for show, and place the real disgrace of poverty not in owning to the fact but in declining the struggle against it. Our public men have, besides politics, their private affairs to attend to, and our ordinary citizens, though occupied with the pursuits of industry, are still fair judges of public matters; for, unlike any other nation, regarding him who takes no part in these duties not as unambitious but as useless, we Athenians are able to judge at all events if we cannot originate, and instead of looking on discussion as a stumbling block in the way of action, we think it an indispensable preliminary to any wise action at all. Again, in our enterprises we present the singular spectacle of daring and deliberation, each carried to its highest point, and both united in the same persons; although usually decision is the fruit of ignorance, hesitation of reflexion. But the palm of courage will surely be adjudged most justly to those, who best know the difference between hardship and pleasure and yet are never tempted to shrink from danger. In generosity we are equally singular, acquiring our friends by conferring not by receiving favours. Yet, of course, the doer of the favour is the firmer friend of the two, in order by continued kindness to keep the recipient in his debt; while the debtor feels less keenly from the very consciousness that the return he makes will be a payment, not a free gift. And it is only the Athenians who, fearless of consequences, confer their benefits not from calculations of expediency, but in the confidence of liberality.

¶7‘In short, I say that as a city we are the school of Hellas; while I doubt if the world can produce a man, who where he has only himself to depend upon, is equal to so many emergencies, and graced by so happy a versatility as the Athenian. And that this is no mere boast thrown out for the occasion, but plain matter of fact, the power of the state acquired by these habits proves. For Athens alone of her contemporaries is found when tested to be greater than her reputation, and alone gives occasion neither to her assailants to blush at the antagonist by whom they have been worsted, nor to her subjects to question her title by merit to rule. Rather, the admiration of the present and succeeding ages will be ours, because we have shown our power not by mere representations, but by mighty proofs, and because far from needing a Homer for our panegyrist, or other of his craft whose verses might charm for the moment only for the impression which they gave to melt at the touch of fact, we forced every sea and land to be the highway of our daring, and everywhere, whether for evil or for good, left imperishable monuments behind us. Such is the Athens for which these men, in the assertion of their determination not to part with her, nobly fought and died; and well may everyone of their survivors be ready to suffer in her cause.

¶8‘Indeed if I have dwelt at some length upon the character of our country, it has been to show that our stake in the struggle is not the same as theirs who have no such blessings to lose, and also that the panegyric of the men over whom I am now speaking might be by definite proofs established. That panegyric is now in a great measure complete; for the Athens that I have celebrated is only what the heroism of these and their like have made her, men whose fame, unlike that of most Hellenes, will be found to be only commensurate with their deserts. And if a test of worth be wanted, it is to be found in their closing scene, and this not only in the cases in which it set the final seal upon their merit, but also in those in which it gave the first intimation of their having any. For there is justice in the claim that stedfastness in his country’s battles should be as a cloak to cover a man’s other imperfections; since the good action has blotted out the bad, and his merit as a citizen more than outweighed his demerits as an individual. But none of these allowed either wealth with its prospect of future enjoyment to unnerve his spirit, or poverty with its hope of a day of freedom and riches to tempt him to shrink from danger. No, holding that vengeance upon their enemies was more to be desired than any personal blessings, and reckoning this to be the most glorious of hazards, they joyfully determined to accept the risk, and making sure of their vengeance to leave their wishes to take care of themselves, and committing to hope the uncertainty of success, to trust to action in the business before them. Thus choosing to die resisting, rather than to live submitting, they fled only from dishonour, but met danger face to face, and after one brief moment, while at the summit of their fortune, were taken away, not from their fear, but from their glory.

¶9‘So died these men as became Athenians. You, their survivors, must determine to have as unfaltering a resolution in the field, though you may pray that it may have a happier issue. And not contented with a mere hearsay notion of the advantages which are involved in the defence of your country, though these would furnish a valuable text to a speaker even before an audience so alive to them as the present, you must yourselves realise the power of Athens, and feed your eyes upon her from day to day, till love of her fills your hearts; and then when all her greatness shall break upon you, you must reflect that it was by courage, sense of duty, and a keen feeling of honour in action that men were enabled to acquire it, and that no personal failure in an enterprise could make them consent to deprive their country of their valour, but they laid it at her feet as the most glorious contribution that they could offer. For this offering of their lives made in common by them all they each of them individually received that renown which never grows old, and for a sepulchre, not so much that in which their bones have been deposited, but that noblest of shrines wherein their glory is laid up to be eternally remembered upon every occasion on which deed or story shall call for its commemoration. For heroes have the whole earth for their tomb; and in lands far from their own, where the column with its epitaph declares it, there is enshrined in every breast a record unwritten with no tablet to preserve it, except that of the heart. These take as your model, and judging happiness to be the fruit of freedom and freedom of valour, never decline the dangers of war. For it is not the miserable that would most justly be unsparing of their lives; these have nothing to hope for: it is rather they to whom continued life may bring reverses as yet unknown, and to whom a fall, if it came, would be most tremendous in its consequences. And surely, to a man of spirit, the degradation of his being a coward must be immeasurably more grievous than the unfelt death which strikes him in the midst of his strength and patriotism!

¶10‘Comfort, therefore, not condolence, is what I have to offer to the parents of the dead who may be here. Numberless are the chances to which, as they know, the life of man is subject; but fortunate indeed are they who draw for their lot a death so glorious as that which has caused your mourning, and to whom life has been so exactly measured as to terminate in the happiness in which it has been passed. Still I know that this is a hard saying, especially when those are in question of whom you will constantly be reminded by seeing in the homes of others blessings of which once you also boasted: for grief is felt not so much for the loss of what we have never known, as for that to which we have been long accustomed. Yet you who are still of an age to beget children must bear up in the hope of having others in their stead; not only will they help you to forget those whom you have lost, but will be to the state at once a reinforcement and a security; for never can a fair or just policy be expected of the citizen who does not, like his fellows, bring to the decision the interests and apprehensions of a father. While those of you who have passed your prime must congratulate yourselves with the thought that the best part of your life was fortunate, and that the brief span that remains will be cheered by the fame of the departed. For honour alone never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness.

¶11‘Turning to the sons or brothers of the dead, I see an arduous struggle before you. When a man is gone, all are wont to praise him, and should your merit be ever so transcendent, you will still find it difficult not merely to overtake, but even to approach their renown. The living have envy to contend with, while those who are no longer in our path are honoured with a goodwill into which rivalry does not enter. On the other hand, if I must say anything on the subject of female excellence to those of you who will now be in widowhood, it will be all comprised in this brief exhortation. Great will be your glory in not falling short of your natural character; and greatest will be hers who is least talked of among the men whether for good or for bad.

¶12‘My task is now finished. I have performed it to the best of my ability, and in word, at least, the requirements of the law are now satisfied. If deeds be in question, those who are here interred have received part of their honours already; for the rest, their children will be brought up at the public expense till manhood by their country, which thereby offers a most useful prize both to them and others, who may, like them, thus be left desolate; for where the greatest rewards for merit are given, there also will merit be most common among the citizens. And now that you have brought to a close your lamentations for your relatives, you may depart.’

Text: Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, Book 2, chapters 35–46, translated by Richard Crawley (Longmans, 1874), checked on the page images.

Paragraph by paragraph what each part does

  1. 1

    Paragraph 1: The problem of praise

    Pericles notes that earlier speakers praised the law requiring this oration. He would rather honor deeds with deeds, and he warns that listeners who knew the dead may find his praise too small while others may suspect exaggeration out of envy. Because the custom is law, he will do his best.

    Why it mattersThe humble opening lowers expectations and builds trust, while introducing the tension between words and deeds that the speech keeps returning to.

  2. 2

    Paragraph 2: Ancestors and a plan

    Pericles praises the ancestors who kept the land free, the fathers who won the empire, and his own generation who enlarged it. He passes over military history as too familiar. Instead he will describe the government and national habits that made Athens great.

    Why it mattersThe brief praise of forebears honors custom, and the announced plan shifts the speech’s weight from the dead to the city.

  3. 3

    Paragraphs 3 to 5: How Athens lives

    Athens is a democracy that favors the many, gives equal justice, and rewards ability over class or poverty. Citizens let each other live as they like but obey the laws. The city offers festivals and imported goods, stays open to foreigners, and trusts the natural courage of its citizens rather than harsh training.

    Why it mattersEach quality is framed against Sparta, a rival named outright only once (the Lacedaemonians of paragraph 5), so the praise also argues that Athens deserves to win the war.

  4. 4

    Paragraphs 6 to 7: The school of Hellas

    Athenians cultivate refinement without extravagance, treat debate as a preparation for action, and combine daring with deliberation. Pericles calls Athens the school of Hellas and says its power proves the claim. It needs no poet, because its daring has left monuments on every land and sea.

    Why it mattersThese paragraphs reach the peak of the city’s praise and close by turning to the men who died for it, the hinge to the next section.

  5. 5

    Paragraphs 8 to 9: The dead and the living

    Praising Athens has largely praised the dead, whose brave end covered any faults. Neither wealth nor poverty made them shrink from danger, and they chose to die resisting rather than live submitting. The survivors must love Athens, remember that heroes have the whole earth for their tomb, and never decline the dangers of war.

    Why it mattersThe speech turns from praise to exhortation: the dead become a model, and the audience is asked to follow them.

  6. 6

    Paragraphs 10 to 12: Comfort and farewell

    Pericles offers parents comfort rather than condolence, urging younger parents to have more children and older ones to take pride in their sons’ fame. Sons and brothers face a hard struggle to equal the dead, and widows will win glory by being least talked of. The children of the dead will be raised at public expense, and the mourners may now depart.

    Why it mattersThe consolation is brief and practical, and it ties private grief back to the needs of the state.

Rhetorical choices what the writer does, and why it works

Humility opening

In paragraph 1 Pericles says deeds would be better honored by deeds and worries that one speaker may fail many brave men. The modesty wins the audience’s trust, and paragraph 12 returns to it: the law is satisfied ‘in word, at least’.

Antithesis

The speech thinks in balanced opposites: wealth ‘more for use than for show’ (paragraph 6), ‘daring and deliberation’ united (paragraph 6), ‘to die resisting, rather than to live submitting’ (paragraph 8), and ‘Comfort, therefore, not condolence’ (paragraph 10). The balance makes Athenian virtues sound reasoned and complete.

Implied contrast with Sparta

Paragraph 5 describes rivals who ‘from their very cradles by a painful discipline seek after manliness’ and names the Lacedaemonians, the Spartans. Every Athenian quality in paragraphs 3 to 6 is sharpened by this unnamed or named opposite, so praise doubles as argument.

Metaphor

Athens is ‘the school of Hellas’ in paragraph 7, a teacher to all of Greece. In paragraph 9 citizens should ‘feed your eyes upon her’ until love of her fills their hearts, and heroes ‘have the whole earth for their tomb’. The images turn the city into something to learn from, to love and to die for.

Direct address by group

Paragraphs 10 and 11 speak in turn to parents, to sons and brothers, and to widows. Addressing each group separately makes the consolation feel personal, though each group is given a duty to the state.

Epideictic structure

A funeral oration is epideictic, a speech of praise and blame. Paragraph 8 explains the design: by praising Athens at length, Pericles has already praised the men who made it great. The structure lets the city stand in for the individual dead, none of whom is named.

People & audiences

Pericles

Speaker

The Athenian statesman chosen to give the oration. He presents himself as a reluctant but dutiful speaker in paragraphs 1 and 12.

Thucydides

Writer

The Athenian historian who reports the speech in Book 2 of his History. The words are his version of what Pericles said, here in Richard Crawley’s translation.

The fallen Athenians

Subject of the speech

The soldiers who died in the first year of the war. No one is named; paragraph 8 says they chose ‘to die resisting, rather than to live submitting.’

The families of the dead

Mourners addressed

Parents (paragraph 10), sons and brothers, and widows (paragraph 11), each given comfort and a duty.

Citizens and foreigners

The crowd

Paragraph 2 says the whole assemblage, ‘whether citizens or foreigners’, may listen with advantage.

The Lacedaemonians

Rivals

The Spartans and their allies, named in paragraph 5. Their strict training and their way of invading with all their confederates are set against Athenian ease and courage.

Big ideas in Pericles' Funeral Oration

Democracy and citizenshipAthens as a modelGlory and sacrificeWords and deedsPrivate grief and public duty

Democracy and citizenship

Paragraph 3 defines democracy as government that favors the many and rewards ability, and paragraph 6 calls a man who takes no part in public affairs ‘useless’. Citizenship means participation, not just freedom.

Athens as a model

The city is ‘rather a pattern to others than imitators’ (paragraph 3) and ‘the school of Hellas’ (paragraph 7). The speech presents Athens as exceptional, which makes its defense a duty to all of Greece.

Glory and sacrifice

Paragraphs 8 and 9 present death in battle as a glorious exchange: brief life for ‘renown which never grows old’. The speech makes honor, not survival, the measure of a life.

Words and deeds

Pericles opens by doubting that words can match deeds (paragraph 1) and says Athens needs no Homer because its deeds speak (paragraph 7). The speech repeatedly ranks action above language, even as it relies on language.

Private grief and public duty

The consolation in paragraphs 10 to 12 keeps turning private loss into public service: have more children for the state, take pride in fame, let the state raise the orphans.

Key images

The tomb

In paragraph 9 the real sepulchre matters less than ‘that noblest of shrines wherein their glory is laid up’, and heroes have ‘the whole earth for their tomb’. The tomb becomes a symbol of memory that outlasts any grave.

The school

Calling Athens ‘the school of Hellas’ in paragraph 7 makes the city a teacher and the rest of Greece its pupils, a claim of cultural leadership.

Repeated words and ideas

Honor that never grows old. The dead receive ‘renown which never grows old’ in paragraph 9, and paragraph 10 says ‘honour alone never grows old’. The repeated phrase offers the living a kind of immortality.

Law. The speech begins and ends with the law that requires it (paragraphs 1 and 12), and paragraph 3 praises obedience to written and unwritten laws. Athenian freedom is presented as freedom within law.

Tensions and counterarguments

Words vs. deeds. Pericles would rather honor deeds with deeds (paragraph 1), yet his task is to speak. He resolves the tension by making his words describe deeds, Athens’ ‘mighty proofs’ in paragraph 7.

Ideals vs. practice. The speech praises freedom and equal justice, yet paragraph 7 mentions Athens’ ‘subjects’ and its right to rule, and paragraph 11 limits women’s glory to silence. Readers debate how far the ideal portrait matches the city it describes.

Key quotes

“Its administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy.”
Paragraph 3. A brief definition of democracy by what it does, the basis of the claim that Athens is worth defending.
“instead of looking on discussion as a stumbling block in the way of action, we think it an indispensable preliminary to any wise action at all.”
Paragraph 6. Pericles answers the charge that debate makes democracies slow: talk, he says, is what makes action wise.
“In short, I say that as a city we are the school of Hellas”
Paragraph 7. The summary claim of the city’s praise: Athens teaches all of Greece. Hellas is the Greek name for Greece.
“Thus choosing to die resisting, rather than to live submitting, they fled only from dishonour, but met danger face to face”
Paragraph 8. Balanced antithesis gives the soldiers’ choice a clear moral shape: death with honor over life in submission.
“For heroes have the whole earth for their tomb”
Paragraph 9. The metaphor frees the dead from any single grave and makes their memory universal.
“greatest will be hers who is least talked of among the men whether for good or for bad.”
Paragraph 11. The only advice to widows, and a reminder of the limits of Athenian freedom: women’s glory lies in not being noticed.
How it ends

The conclusion of Pericles' Funeral Oration, explained

The speech closes in three short movements. First, in paragraph 10, Pericles offers the parents ‘Comfort, therefore, not condolence’. He calls the dead fortunate to have ended their lives in glory, then admits ‘this is a hard saying’ and turns practical. Parents young enough should have more children, both to ease their loss and because, he argues, only a citizen with children at stake can judge the city’s policy fairly. Older parents should take pride that most of their lives were happy and that their sons’ fame will cheer the years left, since ‘honour alone never grows old’. Second, in paragraph 11, he warns sons and brothers that the dead will be hard to equal, because the living face envy and the dead do not. His advice to widows is a single sentence: their greatest glory is to be least talked of among men. Modern readers often stop here, because the line shows who was left out of the democracy the speech celebrates. Finally, in paragraph 12, Pericles says his task is done and the law is satisfied ‘in word, at least’. The phrase returns to the opening contrast between words and deeds. The state’s deed is to raise the children of the dead at public expense until manhood, a prize that, he says, makes merit common among citizens. Then he tells the mourners they may depart. The ending is brief and restrained, which fits a speech that has argued all along that Athens honors its dead best by acting, not talking.

Common misreadings

MythThis is a word-for-word record of what Pericles said.

ActuallyThe speech survives only in Thucydides’ History, and Thucydides says in his opening book that he gave speakers the words he thought the occasion required, keeping to the general sense of what was said. This page adds a further layer: Richard Crawley’s 1874 English translation.

MythPericles describes a democracy in which everyone was equal.

ActuallyIn Athens only free adult male citizens took part in government; women, slaves and resident foreigners did not. The speech itself shows limits, telling widows in paragraph 11 that their glory lies in not being talked about and mentioning Athens’ ‘subjects’ in paragraph 7.

MythThe speech is mainly about the soldiers who died.

ActuallyNo soldier is named. Paragraphs 3 to 7 praise the city, and paragraph 8 explains why: in praising Athens, Pericles says, he has largely praised the men who made it great.

AP practice a rhetorical analysis prompt in the exam's style

In the winter of 431-430 BC, the Athenian statesman Pericles delivered an oration at the public funeral for soldiers killed in the first year of the war with Sparta, as reported by the historian Thucydides. Read the speech carefully. Then write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices Pericles makes to honor the dead and to strengthen the resolve of the living.

What a strong response notices

  • The humble opening of paragraph 1, which questions whether words can match deeds and wins the audience’s trust.
  • The decision in paragraph 2 to praise the city’s government and habits before praising the dead, explained in paragraph 8.
  • The implied and named contrast with Sparta in paragraphs 3 to 5, which turns praise of Athens into an argument for the war.
  • The antithesis of ‘to die resisting, rather than to live submitting’ in paragraph 8 and the metaphor of the whole earth as a tomb in paragraph 9.
  • The consolation by group in paragraphs 10 and 11, which turns private grief into public duty.

Practice prompt written by StoryBites, not taken from a College Board exam. See the AP Language free-response guide for how answers are scored.

Test yourself

1. Why does Pericles say in paragraph 1 that a funeral speech is risky?

2. According to paragraph 3, why is Athens called a democracy?

3. What does Pericles call Athens in paragraph 7?

4. How does paragraph 6 describe the Athenian view of discussion?

5. What does Pericles say the state will do for the children of the dead?

Flashcards flip, self-grade, and the deck remembers what you know

tap to flip
Answer

Explain it like I’m 12

Long ago, Athens and Sparta went to war. At the end of the first year, Athens held a big public funeral for its soldiers who had died. A leader named Pericles gave the speech. Instead of talking mostly about the soldiers, he talked about why Athens was special: people ruled together, the law was fair, and the city was open to everyone. He said the soldiers died for a city worth loving. He told the families to be proud, not just sad. We know the speech because a historian named Thucydides wrote it down in his own words.

Compare & connect

The Gettysburg Address

Abraham Lincoln

Another speech at a burial ground for soldiers that honors the dead by explaining what they died for, then turns to the duty of the living. Readers have long set the two side by side.

Apology

Plato

Another speech from Athens, reported by a writer who shaped it. Pericles praises Athens for welcoming debate; about thirty years later, in 399 BC, Athens tries Socrates for impiety and corrupting the young, and in Plato’s account he traces the hostility to his questioning.

Dulce et Decorum Est

Wilfred Owen

Pericles calls death in battle glorious; Owen, writing in the First World War, calls the old idea that it is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country a lie. The two make a sharp debate about war and honor.

Discussion and essay prompts:

💬 Discussion questions

  • What is the main idea of Pericles’ Funeral Oration
  • What does Pericles say about democracy in the Funeral Oration
  • What does school of Hellas mean
  • How does Pericles' Funeral Oration explore the theme of democracy and citizenship?
  • How does Pericles' Funeral Oration explore the theme of athens as a model?
  • What is the central conflict in Pericles' Funeral Oration, and how does it shape the ending?

✎ Essay prompts

  1. Analyze how Thucydides develops the theme of democracy and citizenship in Pericles' Funeral Oration. Support your argument with specific evidence from the text.
  2. Examine the significance of the tomb in Pericles' Funeral Oration. What does it represent, and how does it deepen the work’s meaning?
  3. How does Thucydides use humility opening to shape the reader’s experience of Pericles' Funeral Oration?
  4. Some readers assume that this is a word-for-word record of what Pericles said. Argue for or against this interpretation, using evidence from the text.

Key questions students ask

  • What is the main idea of Pericles’ Funeral Oration
  • What does Pericles say about democracy in the Funeral Oration
  • What does school of Hellas mean
  • Did Pericles really say the Funeral Oration or did Thucydides write it
  • Why does Pericles praise Athens instead of the dead soldiers
  • What does Pericles say to the widows in the Funeral Oration

Analysis is original StoryBites commentary. The full text and quotations follow Richard Crawley’s translation of Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War (Book 2, chapters 35 to 46), first published complete in 1874, checked page by page against the images of an 1876 printing of that edition. Thucydides’ text is ancient, and Crawley’s translation is in the public domain.

Share this guide

Continue exploring

Follow a thread — every work connects to others through what they share.