Notes from Underground
A spiteful, unnamed former official argues from his Petersburg corner that people will never live by reason alone, then recalls the snowy days when he disgraced himself and cruelly spurned a young woman’s love.
📖 Read the full bookThe complete public-domain novel, paired with the StoryBites version of every chapterThe narrator is forty, retired, and living in a shabby room on the edge of Petersburg, and he opens by announcing that he is a sick man and a spiteful one. Then he picks a fight with his whole century: with science, with progress, with the idea that people always act in their own interest, and with the dream of a palace of crystal. He insists that people would go mad on purpose just to prove they are not piano keys. In the second half he stops arguing and starts remembering, and the memories are worse: a farewell dinner where he makes a fool of himself, and a young woman named Liza whom he moves to tears and then humiliates. The book is short, uncomfortable, and darkly comic, and it keeps asking what people really want if it is not their own advantage.
What happens in Notes from Underground
The nameless narrator, a retired official of forty, writes from his corner, a wretched room on the outskirts of Petersburg. In Part One he addresses imagined gentlemen. He calls himself sick and spiteful, then admits he could never become anything at all, not even an insect. Too much consciousness, he argues, is a disease: it leads to inertia and to a shameful pleasure in one’s own humiliation, like an educated man’s malicious moans over toothache. Men of action charge ahead until they meet a stone wall, the laws of nature and the rule that twice two makes four, and they accept it. He refuses to be reconciled to the wall. He attacks the belief that people do wrong only because they misunderstand their interests, and the dream of a palace of crystal where science has tabulated every choice and a man is no more than a piano key. What people want most, he says, is independent choice, even when it harms them. He ends Part One by admitting he believes none of it and turning to a memory revived by the wet snow. Part Two goes back to when he was twenty-four and a clerk. An officer in a tavern moves him aside without noticing him, and he nurses the insult for years before bumping shoulders with him on the Nevsky. Visiting his schoolfellow Simonov, he invites himself to a farewell dinner for Zverkov, a schoolmate now in the army. No one tells him the dinner has moved to six, so he waits an hour. He insults Zverkov with a sarcastic toast, challenges Ferfitchkin to a duel, and paces the room for three hours while the others ignore him. He extracts six roubles from Simonov and follows the party to a brothel to slap Zverkov, but they have gone. There he meets Liza, a twenty-year-old from Riga. Waking beside her in the night, he describes the misery awaiting her until she sobs, and he gives her his address. Days later she arrives while he is screaming at his servant Apollon. Ashamed, he tells her he was only playing with her. She sees that he is unhappy and embraces him, but his passion is a kind of revenge, and afterward he presses money into her hand. She leaves the crumpled note on his table and goes. He runs after her into the snow, stops, and never sees her again.
Where and when Notes from Underground happens
Petersburg
The narrator calls it the most theoretical and intentional town on the whole terrestrial globe. Part Two moves through its offices, the Nevsky, the Hotel de Paris, and a brothel that passes as a milliner’s shop, all under falling wet snow.
The narrator’s corner
At forty he writes in a wretched room on the outskirts of town. At twenty-four he lives in a shabby flat with a leather sofa losing its stuffing, while Apollon keeps to his room behind a partition.
The Hotel de Paris
The scene of Zverkov’s farewell dinner, where the narrator waits an hour alone and later paces from the table to the stove while the others ignore him.
Two points in one life
Part One is written when the narrator is forty. Part Two goes back to a few days of wet snow when he was twenty-four.
Chapter by chapter summary + why it matters
- 1
Part One: A Sick and Spiteful Man
The narrator introduces himself: forty, a retired collegiate assessor, spiteful and yet unable to become anything, neither a hero nor an insect. He argues that too much consciousness is a disease that breeds inertia and a shameful pleasure in humiliation, and he pictures the conscious man as an insulted mouse nursing its spite in its hole for forty years. Men of action charge like bulls until they hit the stone wall of natural law and twice two makes four, but he refuses to accept that wall just because he cannot knock it down. He ends with the toothache, whose educated sufferer moans out of malice and takes pleasure in it.
Why it mattersDostoevsky’s footnote says the writer and his notes are imaginary, but that such people must exist in Russian society. The narrator’s habit of taking back what he has just said warns us from the first page not to read him at face value.
- 2
Reason, Advantage, and the Piano Key
He explains that he cannot act because every cause leads back to another, so even his anger dissolves and only inertia is left; he would respect himself if he were at least lazy. He then attacks the idea that people do wrong only because they misunderstand their own interests, citing the bloodshed of his civilized century against Buckle’s claim that civilization makes people gentler. Science promises to tabulate every choice, turn man into a piano key, and build a palace of crystal, but he insists that the most advantageous advantage is free choice, even a stupid one. People, he says, would go mad on purpose to prove they are men and not piano keys.
Why it mattersThe narrator does not reject reason; he calls it an excellent thing that satisfies only one part of human nature. These chapters argue with the confident rationalism of Russian radicals in the 1860s, including Nikolai Chernyshevsky’s novel What Is to Be Done?
- 3
Hurrah for Underground
He asks how reformers know that people need reforming and suggests that humans love building roads more than arriving, unlike ants content with their ant-heap, and may love suffering and chaos as well. Certainty as positive as twice two makes four is, he says, the beginning of death, and he rejects a palace of crystal at which no one may even stick out a tongue. He cries hurrah for underground, then admits he is lying, imagines his readers calling it all lies, and confesses he invented their words too. Claiming to write only for himself, he turns to a memory that the falling wet snow has brought back.
Why it mattersPart One ends by undercutting its own argument: the narrator can defend freedom but cannot live it. The turn to the snow ties his theories to the shameful memories that follow.
- 4
Part Two: The Officer on the Nevsky
The section opens with lines from Nekrassov about a speaker whose passionate words rescue a soul from vice. At twenty-four the narrator is a lonely clerk who despises and fears his colleagues and slips out at night into petty vice. When an officer in a tavern moves him aside without noticing him, he broods for years, borrows from his superior Anton Antonitch Syetotchkin to help buy a beaver collar, and at last bumps the officer shoulder to shoulder on the Nevsky. Between bouts of dissipation he dreams of heroic glory, and when solitude grows unbearable he visits Anton Antonitch on Tuesdays or, one Thursday, his old schoolfellow Simonov.
Why it mattersThe bump shows how much energy he spends on a victory the officer barely notices. The epigraph sets up a rescue story that the rest of Part Two turns upside down.
- 5
The Farewell Dinner
At Simonov’s he finds Ferfitchkin and Trudolyubov planning a dinner for Zverkov, a swaggering schoolmate turned officer, and he invites himself, though he owes Simonov fifteen roubles and can pay only by holding back his servant Apollon’s wages. That night he relives his miserable school years, and the next day nobody has told him the dinner moved from five to six, so he waits an hour at the Hotel de Paris. Drunk and furious, he makes an insulting toast, challenges Ferfitchkin to a duel, and paces from the table to the stove for three hours while the others ignore him. When they leave for another place, he begs Simonov for six roubles to follow them.
Why it mattersThe dinner is a comedy of humiliation in which the narrator causes most of his own suffering. His plea for Zverkov’s friendship right after insulting everyone shows the swing between pride and need that rules him.
- 6
Liza
Racing by sledge through the wet snow, he imagines slapping Zverkov, a duel, and Siberia, then recognizes the fantasy as borrowed from Pushkin and Lermontov. At the brothel the others have already gone, and he meets Liza, a twenty-year-old from Riga. Waking beside her at two in the morning, he tells her about a coffin carried out of a basement and describes the decline and lonely death awaiting her until she sobs into her pillow. He gives her his address, and before he leaves she proudly shows him a respectful love letter from a student.
Why it mattersHe admits that the exercise of his power over her attracts him even as he feels what he says. Liza’s remark that he speaks like a book is more accurate than he wants to admit.
- 7
The Five-Rouble Note
He smooths things over with Simonov in a lying letter, then dreads that Liza will come and see his poverty and Apollon’s rudeness. She arrives just as he is screaming at Apollon over withheld wages, and in his shame he tells her he was only laughing at her and wanted power. She sees that he is unhappy and embraces him, but his passion is revenge, and when she leaves he presses money into her hand; she leaves the crumpled five-rouble note on his table. He runs after her into the snow, stops, and never sees her again, and after his closing reflections a bracketed note says the paradoxalist kept writing but this seems a good place to stop.
Why it mattersThe ending reverses the Nekrassov epigraph: the would-be rescuer is the one who needs rescue, and he cannot accept a love he does not control.
Characters and how they connect
The narrator
Unnamed writer of the notes
A retired official of forty who writes from his underground corner. Readers often call him the Underground Man, but the book never gives his name. Clever, proud, and spiteful, he craves respect and love and ruins every chance at either.
Liza
Young woman in a brothel
Twenty years old, from Riga, and only a fortnight in the house when the narrator meets her. Guarded at first, she is moved by his speeches and later offers him the real love he cannot accept.
Apollon
The narrator’s servant
An elderly, dignified man who lisps, reads psalms aloud, and works part of his time as a tailor. He treats his master with calm contempt and wins their battles of will.
Zverkov
Schoolmate, now an officer
A handsome, swaggering former classmate who inherited an estate of two hundred serfs. The narrator has hated him since school, and Zverkov’s polite condescension at the dinner wounds him more than open rudeness.
Simonov
Old schoolfellow
A quiet, even-tempered schoolfellow with some independence and honesty, who arranges Zverkov’s dinner. He puts up with the narrator, forgets to tell him the new time, and finally flings him six roubles.
Ferfitchkin
Schoolmate and old enemy
A Russianized German with the face of a monkey, a flatterer who borrows money from Zverkov, and the narrator’s bitter enemy since the lower forms.
The officer
Stranger in a tavern
An officer over six foot tall who moves the narrator aside at a billiard table as if he were a fly. The narrator stalks him for years and finally bumps into him on the Nevsky.
Anton Antonitch Syetotchkin
The narrator’s superior
His immediate superior at the office and, he says, the only permanent acquaintance of his life. He lends the narrator money twice and hosts dull Tuesday evenings.
Character Relationships who connects to whom, and the themes that bind them
Love / marriage
Power / control
Rivalry / conflict
Connection
Themes in Notes from Underground what the novel is really about
Consciousness and inertia
The narrator argues that a highly conscious person sees too many causes and doubts to act at all. Men of action succeed because they are limited, while he is left with conscious inertia and a strange pleasure in his own humiliation.
Free will against reason
He grants that reason is excellent but insists it is only one part of life. People want independent choice so much that they will act against their own interests, or even go mad, to prove they are not piano keys.
Humiliation and power
Almost every relationship in the book is a contest. Humiliated by the officer, his schoolmates, and his own servant, the narrator passes the humiliation on to Liza and admits that what he wanted was power.
Books versus real life
The narrator lives through borrowed stories, from heroic daydreams to a duel fantasy he recognizes as Pushkin and Lermontov. Liza says he talks like a book, and he ends by claiming that people in general find real life hard work and prefer it in books.
Isolation and the fear of love
He longs to embrace humanity but manages it only on Anton Antonitch’s Tuesdays. When Liza offers real love, he admits that for him loving means tyrannizing, and he drives her away.
Symbols & motifs
The underground
His name for his corner and his state of mind: the mouse-hole where an insulted, conscious person hides and nurses spite for years.
The stone wall
The laws of nature and mathematics. Men of action stop at it calmly, while the narrator refuses to be reconciled to a wall just because he lacks the strength to knock it down.
The palace of crystal
The rational utopia of the future, often called the crystal palace in other translations. He fears it because it can never be destroyed and no one may even stick out a tongue at it.
The wet snow
Yellow, dingy snow falling as he writes brings back the memory of Part Two, and it keeps falling on the day of the dinner, during the sledge ride, and on the night he loses Liza.
The five-rouble note
The money he presses into Liza’s hand tries to turn her love into a transaction. By leaving it crumpled on his table, she refuses that meaning.
Recurring motifs
The good and the beautiful. The narrator repeats this phrase with heavy irony for the lofty feelings he indulges in dreams while living meanly.
Twice two makes four. The formula stands for certainty and natural law. He calls it a piece of insolence and says that twice two makes five can be charming too.
Insects, mice, and flies. He could not become even an insect, pictures the conscious man as a mouse, and feels treated like a fly by the officer and his schoolmates.
Important quotes
“I am a sick man.... I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man.”
“I swear, gentlemen, that to be too conscious is an illness—a real thorough-going illness.”
“I admit that twice two makes four is an excellent thing, but if we are to give everything its due, twice two makes five is sometimes a very charming thing too.”
“You believe in a palace of crystal that can never be destroyed—a palace at which one will not be able to put out one’s tongue or make a long nose on the sly.”
“I had been humiliated, so I wanted to humiliate; I had been treated like a rag, so I wanted to show my power”
“I never met Liza again and I have heard nothing of her.”
The ending of Notes from Underground, explained
Notes from Underground ends twice, once in the story and once in the frame. In the story, Liza comes to the narrator’s shabby flat four days after their night together and finds him screaming at his servant. Ashamed to be seen in his torn dressing-gown, he tells her that the speech which moved her was a game: he had been humiliated at dinner and wanted to humiliate someone. Liza hears something else in his words, that he is unhappy, and she embraces him. For a moment the rescue story of the Nekrassov epigraph runs in reverse, with the young woman comforting the man. The narrator cannot bear it. His sudden passion is, as Liza soon understands, a form of revenge, and when she leaves he presses money into her hand to turn what happened into a transaction. She leaves the crumpled blue five-rouble note on his table. He runs after her into the snow, stops at the crossroads, and asks himself whether he would only hate and torture her tomorrow. At home he consoles himself with the thought that her resentment will purify her, and he asks whether cheap happiness or exalted suffering is better. He never sees her again. In the frame, he calls his notes a corrective punishment rather than literature, says he has gathered all the traits of an anti-hero, and claims that his readers are just as divorced from real life as he is, only better at deceiving themselves. A bracketed note then says the paradoxalist kept writing but that this is a good place to stop. Readers disagree about what it all means. Many see Liza as the book’s moral center, so that her love is the real answer to the arguments of Part One and his refusal of it is his tragedy. Others read the novel as a diagnosis of a type, as Dostoevsky’s footnote suggests, with no cure offered. Many twentieth-century readers treated the narrator as an early existentialist voice whose defense of free choice deserves to be taken seriously on its own terms.
Common misreadings
MythThe narrator speaks directly for Dostoevsky.
ActuallyDostoevsky’s own footnote says the writer and the notes are imaginary, a type he believed his society was bound to produce. The narrator also contradicts himself and says he believes nothing he has written.
MythThe narrator is simply against reason and science.
ActuallyHe calls reason an excellent thing. His objection is to the claim that reason and self-interest can fully explain and govern what people choose.
MythPart Two continues the story after Part One.
ActuallyPart Two goes back in time. The narrator writes Part One at forty and then recalls events from when he was twenty-four.
Test yourself
1. What does the narrator call a real, thorough-going illness?
In chapter II of Part One he says that to be too conscious is an illness.
2. Which image does the narrator use for the laws of nature and mathematics?
Men of action stop calmly at the stone wall of natural law, and he refuses to be reconciled to it.
3. Why does the narrator wait an hour alone before Zverkov’s dinner?
The dinner was changed from five to six o’clock, and Simonov admits he forgot to let him know.
4. Where does Liza come from?
She tells him she comes from Riga, where her parents are tradespeople.
5. What does Liza do with the money the narrator presses into her hand?
After she goes, he finds the crumpled blue five-rouble note on the table.
Flashcards flip, self-grade, and the deck remembers what you know
Nice work.
A lonely, grumpy man of forty writes down his thoughts in a small room in the Russian city of Petersburg. First he argues that thinking too much makes it hard to act. He also says people will never behave like machines, because they want to choose for themselves, even when their choices are bad. Then he remembers something shameful from when he was twenty-four: he pushed his way into a dinner with old classmates who did not want him there and made a fool of himself. Afterward he met a young woman named Liza, talked to her about her sad future, and gave her his address. When she came to see him and offered him kindness, he was cruel to her because he felt ashamed, and she left for good. The book asks why people sometimes hurt themselves and others on purpose.
Compare & connect the story universe
The Overcoat
Another story of a poor, overlooked Petersburg clerk, by a writer Dostoevsky’s narrator mentions by name.
Bartleby, the Scrivener
A clerk’s quiet refusal to act baffles everyone around him, much as the narrator’s inertia does.
The Metamorphosis
The narrator says he tried and failed to become an insect; Kafka’s hero wakes up as one, and both stories study shame and isolation.
Hamlet
A hero whose thinking keeps him from acting, close to the narrator’s claim that consciousness leads to inertia.
Discussion & essay prompts for class, or your next paper
💬 Discussion questions
- Who is the Underground Man in Notes from Underground
- What does the crystal palace symbolize in Notes from Underground
- What does twice two makes four mean in Notes from Underground
- How does Notes from Underground explore the theme of consciousness and inertia?
- How does Notes from Underground explore the theme of free will against reason?
- What is the central conflict in Notes from Underground, and how does it shape the ending?
✎ Essay prompts
- Analyze how Fyodor Dostoevsky develops the theme of consciousness and inertia in Notes from Underground. Support your argument with specific evidence from the text.
- Examine the significance of the underground in Notes from Underground. What does it represent, and how does it deepen the work’s meaning?
- How does Fyodor Dostoevsky use unreliable narrator to shape the reader’s experience of Notes from Underground?
- Some readers assume that the narrator speaks directly for Dostoevsky. Argue for or against this interpretation, using evidence from the text.
Key questions students ask
- Who is the Underground Man in Notes from Underground
- What does the crystal palace symbolize in Notes from Underground
- What does twice two makes four mean in Notes from Underground
- Why does the narrator give Liza money at the end of Notes from Underground
- How are Part One and Part Two of Notes from Underground connected
- Why does the narrator call consciousness a disease in Notes from Underground
Analysis is original StoryBites commentary. Quotations and the full text are from Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground (1864) in the English translation by Constance Garnett (Macmillan, 1918; Project Gutenberg eBook #36034), which is in the public domain.
Continue exploring
Follow a thread — every work connects to others through what they share.Before StoryBites Editions, literary educator Karen Bernardo wrote thoughtful analyses that helped thousands of students understand classic literature. We’re proud to preserve her original reading of Notes from Underground as part of this Edition.
Read Karen’s original analysis →